News Release: Temporary Protected Status (TPS) – Honduras extended until July 5, 2018, Nicaragua to terminate on January 5, 2019

Breaking News Release from USCIS - Honduras & Nicaragua TPS

Acting Secretary Elaine Duke Announcement on Temporary Protected Status for Nicaragua And Honduras

Release Date: November 6, 2017

WASHINGTON— Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Elaine Duke has determined that Temporary Protected Status (TPS) is no longer necessary for nationals of Nicaragua and will terminate the designation on January 5, 2019. She has also announced that more information is needed to determine the necessity of the TPS designation for eligible nationals of Honduras, and thus extended the TPS designation until July 5, 2018. Based on the information available, it is possible that TPS designation for Honduras will be terminated after the 6-month extension.

If you currently hold TPS from a country slated to lose TPS designation, you will be required to leave the country or begin the process of obtaining legal immgiration status, if you are eligible, on or before the TPS termination date. Contact us today to help you determine if you have a path to legal immigration status.

Click here for the full press release from DHS.


**If you have questions about your eligibility for TPS and/ or are looking to file, contact an experienced immigration attorney at The Shapiro Law Firm, LLC, today.**

WYRWTK | Episode #15 | My case is administratively closed, do I need to tell the Immigration Court that I changed my address?

Transcript: Hi, I am Attorney Shaffer, today on “What You Really Want to Know,” we answer the question, “My case is Administratively Closed, do I need to tell the Immigration Court that I changed my address?”

The answer is, Yes!!! In fact, anyone who is currently in Removal or Deportation Proceedings must tell the immigration court and the Department of Homeland Security, or DHS, that he or she changed address within 5 days of moving.


What does it mean if your case is administratively closed?

It means that you are still “in removal/ deportation proceedings” but there is no future court date scheduled. It is basically a long pause. or legal limbo. At any time, either DHS or yourself can file a motion to put your case back on the calendar and continue your removal proceedings. Motions to Re-Calendar can be filed for a variety of reasons: DHS will file them if you are arrested after your case was closed or if the President directs them to continue with trying to deport you. We, on the other hand, file these motions for our clients when they have new relief from removal available. For example, if they married a U.S. Citizen and now have an approved marriage petition or if there is a change in country conditions constituting a new ground for asylum.

So why is it important for the Immigration Court and DHS to have your correct address?

If DHS decides to put your case back on the immigration court calendar, they are required to notify you by mailing a notice of hearing to your last known address and a copy to the attorney that you had at your last hearing, if you had one at all. As long as the address that DHS mails the notice to matches the one on file at the Immigration Court, DHS has satisfied the notice requirement under the law. There is no additional mailing requirements like a signature or sending the notice by registered or certified mail.


So considering the lax notice requirements combined with the fact that your case can be re-calendared at anytime, it is extremely important that the Immigration Court and DHS and/ or ICE has your correct address on file. If you did not receive notice of the new hearing and you miss that hearing, you will be ordered removed in absentia. If you move the court to vacate the in absentia order, as long as DHS shows that they mailed the notice to the address on file, the court will deny your motion to vacate and you will have no ability to ever fight your deportation or removal order. It is your responsibility to make sure that DHS has the correct address on file.


And this is true even if you have an attorney, who should also get a copy of all of your hearing notices. But do not think that you are covered just because you had an attorney. I cannot even tell you how many times we have received a notice for a client and we try to contact him or her and the phone # is out of service and the mail is returned to us with no forwarding address. Your attorney will not know how to reach you if you do not inform him or her that you have a new phone # or address!


Don’t wait to find out that you missed court and now have an order of removal when ICE comes knocking on your door, make sure that the address that is on file with the Immigration Court and DHS is correct today! If you are not sure what is going on with your case or you need help filing a change of address contact an experienced immigration attorney at The Shapiro Law Firm, LLC today!

That is all for this episode of “What You Really Want to Know,” thanks for watching!


**Attorney Advertising** Please be advised that that all information provided above is general in nature and does not create an attorney-client relationship.**Attorney Advertising**

Who Did President Trump 212(f) Today? | UPDATE: Travel Ban Take 3 – What you need to know

Who Did President Trump 212(f) Today?

What you need to know about the third version of the “Travel Ban”

On September 24, 2017, President Trump signed what is essentially the third version of the Travel Ban, (hereinafter, EO-3), in the form of a Presidential Proclamation entitled, “Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry Into the United States by Terrorists or Other Public-Safety Threats.” The White House also concurrently released a Fact Sheet and FAQin conjunction with the Proclamation. The newest travel ban was set to take effect on October 18, 2017, but it was blocked again before it went into effect by two U.S. District Courts by way of a preliminary injunction.

The latest travel ban brings about a host of new questions.


What is new?

Chad, Venezuela & North Korea added, Sudan removed from the 212(f) list. EO-3 now includes: Chad, Venezuela, North Korea, Somalia. Yemen, Iran, Syria & Libya. Country-specific justification is included the the proclamation.

No more 90-day ban limit, this one is indefinite. Both previous versions of the travel ban had a time limit on how long the travel ban would be in effect. In a departure from the previous versions, EO-3 is indefinite.

Not all of the countries on the list are Muslim-majority. Another notable change in EO-3 is the addition of Non-Muslim majority countries: North Korea and Venezuela.


What does this mean for the pending challenge to Travel Ban 2.0?

2 cases challenging the second Travel Ban had made their way to the Supreme Court before President Trump issued EO-3. A day after President Trump issued the Proclamation, the Supreme Court removed both travel ban cases from the oral argument calendar (originally scheduled for October 10) and ordered both sides to write briefs regarding whether the cases were moot in light of the new proclamation and upcoming expiration. Those briefs were due on October 5.

So far, the Supreme Court has already dismissed one of these challenges as moot (Trump v. International Refugee Assistance Project), meaning that the case no longer presents a live case or controversy. This dismissal was due to the fact that the second Travel Ban previously expired and EO-3 is meant to replace the old one. The Supreme Court sided with the Federal Government’s argument that the second Travel Ban expired by its’ own terms. thereby no longer presenting a live case or controversy, and vacated the 4th circuit court’s ruling which temporarily enjoined the federal government from enforcing the ban.

The other challenge in the Supreme Court, Trump v. Hawaii, is still pending since this case also challenges the 120-day ban on the admission of refugees. Although it should be noted that this part of the March 6 Executive Order is set to expire on October 24, and it is likely that the Supreme Court will also dismiss this case as moot once it expires at the end of the month without reaching the merits of the case.


Does the addition of non-Muslim majority countries make EO-3 Constitutional?

With challenges to the latest travel ban already underway, the question on everyone’s mind is whether the fact that North Korea and Venezuela, 2 non-Muslim majority countries, have been added to the ban establishes that EO-3 is not based on religious discrimination.

Although the mere fact that 2 non-Muslim majority countries have been added to the list alone will not destroy the religious discrimination argument, it arguably makes the government’s position stronger.

However, the two U.S. District Courts that issued the preliminary injunctions, have made it clear that they are reading the justification listed for each banned country in EO-3 very closely to ensure that banning the entry of foreign nationals from each country will achieve the stated national security purposes.

The District Courts are clearly stating that although the President has wide latitude to control the admissions of foreign nationals into this country and the courts are limited in their ability to question the President on these matters, the President is still subject to checks and balances. It is important to remind readers that no President has ever utilized INA 212(f) to suspend entry of foreign nationals to such a broad extent. This is true in regards to both the indefinite length of the travel ban as well as the large category of people that it applies to. See related posts for more information.

A preliminary injunction was granted because the 2 courts believe that EO-3 challengers have a strong likelihood of success on the merits of the case, i.e., that EO-3 is unconstitutional. However, as with the previous EO challenges, the courts have yet to receive the full arguments from both sides as to the constitutionality of EO-3, let alone the merits of the overall case.

Although their are many issues that the court has to weave through before reaching the constitutional question, it does appear that these cases will end up back in the Supreme Court in the near future.


On a related note…

INA 212(f) is not the only tool at the President’s disposal to prevent foreign nationals from entering the United States. On October 8, President Trump suspended nonimmigrant visa services in Turkey after a Turkish employee of the American Consulate in Istanbul was arrested after being accused of espionage against the Turkish government. The U.S. cited concerns over the safety of its’ consular staff in Turkey. Turkish nationals are still able to apply for nonimmigrant visas and have them processed in other countries. Turkey has responded in kind, banning short-term American visitors from entering the country.

The suspension of visa processing of the admission of foreign nationals from entering the United States is a diplomatic tool that has always been at the President’s disposal, even before INA 212(f) came into existence. Previous Presidents have elected to wield this tool in the past, but we are definitely seeing it utilized now at an unprecedented level. Only time will tell if this diplomatic strategy will be a success.


Note: “Attorney Advertising” The information contained in this web site is intended to convey general information. It should not be construed as legal advice or opinion. It is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Any email sent via the Internet using email addresses listed in this web site would not be confidential and would not create an attorney-client relationship.

Case Status Update: Approvals: Asylee Green Card, VAWA Green Card, Work Permits (EAD)

PART 2 OF CASE STATUS UPDATE:

Asylee Green Card Approved – We also received an approval notice for an Asylee Green Card for a client, (hereinafter, “R”), a native and citizen of Mali. R obtained status as an asylee after his wife was granted asylum by the Immigration Judge. R was initially the main asylum applicant and was granted voluntary departure in 1996 but never departed the country.

In 2009, R and his wife filed a joint motion with DHS to reopen their removal proceedings and it was granted to allow R’s wife to file a new asylum application. In 2016, R’s wife’s asylum application was granted and a year later they both applied for Green Cards. R’s wife is still waiting for her Green Card to be approved but the couple, who have 4 U.S. Citizen children, are so happy that after over 20 years, R finally has a Green Card!

I-797, I-485 - Application to Adjust Status to Permanent Resident  Approval Notice

Asylee Travel Document Approval – We also received an approval for a refugee/asylee travel document for R that we had filed before his Green Card was approved because he had an emergency and needed to temporarily go aboard. Technically, R no longer needs a travel document to travel abroad and re-enter the United States because he can do so freely with his Green Card. The Asylee Travel Document is useful for a Permanent Resident if he or she no longer has a valid passport of his or her country of citizenship since one does not need a passport to travel abroad with an asylee travel document.

I-797C, I-131 Application for Travel Document


I-485 approval (VAWA Beneficiary + EWI) – Next approval is for our client, (hereinafter, “T”), a native and citizen of Senegal, initially entered the U.S. without inspection (EWI) in 2005. T married a Permanent Resident in 2009 and had a son with him. Years later, T’s husband starting acting differently towards her when he decided that he did not want her to leave the house and would act physically violent towards her in an attempt to control her. T reached her breaking point when her husband assaulted her and broke her phone so that she could not call the police. T obtained a Family Court Order of Protection against T and received help from a non-profit victim assistance organization called Safe Horizon. We then helped her file a VAWA petition and a Green Card application.

T and her U.S. Citizen son are now safe and relieved that T is a Permanent Resident. Remember, you can file for VAWA even if you do not have proof of your entry into the U.S. or if you entered illegally!

I-797, I-485 - Application to Adjust Status to Permanent Resident Approval Notice


Green Card Approval for Spouse of Lawful Permanent ResidentOur final Green Card (I-485) approval notice from the last couple of months is for a client, (hereinafter “Q”), who is native and citizen of Mali. Q entered the U.S. in 2004 with a B-2 Visitor Visa. Her Green Card was based on an approved marriage petition filed by her Lawful Permanent Resident Spouse.

I-797C, I-485 - Application to Adjust Status to Lawful Permanent Resident Approval


Initial Work Permit (EAD) Approvals for Asylum ApplicantsWe have received a large number of first time applications for employment authorization approved for asylum applicants Below are the approval notices and the country of nationality or citizenship each client is from:

Native and Citizen of Nigeria:

Form I-797C, I-765 Approval Notice

Native and Citizen of Nigeria:

Form I-797C, I-765 Approval Notice

Native and Citizen of Indonesia:

Form I-797, I-765 Approval Notice

Native and Citizen of Indonesia:

Form I-797C, I-765 Approval Notice

Native and Citizen of Indonesia:

Form I-797C, I-765 Approval Notice

Native and Citizen of Nigeria:

Form I-797C, I-765 Approval Notice

Native and Citizen of Nigeria:

Native and Citizen of Nigeria:

Form I-797C, I-765 Approval Notice

Native and Citizen of Nigeria:

Form I-797C, I-765 Approval Notice

Native and Citizen of Indonesia:

Form I-797, I-765 Approval Notice

Native and Citizen of Cote d’Ivoire (Ivory Coast):

Form I-797C, I-765 Approval Notice

Native and Citizen of Cote d’Ivoire (Ivory Coast):

Form I-797C, I-765 Approval Notice

Asylum applicants can apply for work permits 180 days after their asylum application was received by USCIS. These Work Permits (EAD) are now valid for 2 years and can be renewed if the application is still pending. Renewals are common today as the wait time for an asylum interview and for immigration court (if your asylum application is not initially approved) is averaging 3 years or more.




We wish all of our recently-approved clients the best of luck!


**If you need representation in Removal/ Deportation proceedings or with help filing for immigration benefits, contact an experienced immigration attorney at The Shapiro Law Firm today to get started!**


(*please note that all identification information has been removed in order to protect our clients’ privacy and in order to fully comply with attorney advertising rules and regulations*)

Case Status Update: Approvals: H-1B+ Dependents, I-130s, DACA Renewal, I-751, VAWA Green Card

A long overdue case status update! The Shapiro Law Firm has been very busy over the last couple of months and the approval notices have piled up! This means lots of happy clients! Here is a rundown of the latest approval notices that we have received:

H-1B Renewal & H-4 Dependents Approvals First up is an approval notice for an H-1B (and H-4) renewal. The employer is a successful tech company and the employee, (hereinafter “X”) is a native and citizen of France. X is been in the U.S. with his wife (a native and citizen of Vietnam) and his two sons (one is also a native and citizen of France and his other son was born in the U.S. this year).

We also filed for a foreign labor certification for X that was approved earlier this year. Now that X’s H-1B renewal is approved, X and his employer can focus on filing the Immigrant Visa Petition for an Alien Worker so that X can concurrently file for his employment-based Green Card. If X or his employer choose not to pursue the Green Card, X will not be able to renew his H-1B again (you can be in the U.S. for a maximum of 6-years as an H-1B Visa Holder) and will have to leave the country when his H-1B expires in a few years. X’s H-1B Renewal Petition was not subject to the annual H-1B cap.

I-797C, I-129 Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Approval Notice

I-797C, I-539 - Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status Approval Notice


Petition to Remove Conditions on Residency for Abused Spouse and Son Approved – Next is an approval notice for an I-751 Petition to Remove Conditions on Permanent Residency for a client, (hereinafter, Y”), and her son who are natives and citizens of Jamaica. Y’s had to self-petition to remove the conditions on her residency after she was subjected to extreme cruelty by her U.S. Citizen Spouse.

Y met her U.S. Citizen Spouse in 2008 on the F Train and married 3 years later. Y and her son received her Conditional Residency in May of 2012 based on the Marriage Petition filed by her U.S. Citizen Spouse. Everything was going great between Y and her husband until shortly after they got married when Y’s behavior began to change. He became extremely jealous and controlling and act out in public by yelling at Y if another man even looked at her. He would not even let Y travel to Jamaica to see her family without him. Y’s husband’s behavior escalated from verbal abuse to physical abuse very quickly, at one point violently slamming a car door on her leg, leaving bruises. Despite their marital woes, Y did not know where to turn for help so she tried to make it work with her husband. In May of 2014 Y filed her first I-751 as a joint petition with her husband. While the I-751 was pending, Y’s husband’s behavior continue to get worse, his verbal threats became death threats and he continued to use more and more physical force against her. Y was so fearful that she stopped going home after work, opting to sleep at friend’s houses or sit in the 24 hours Dunkin’ Donuts across the street. Y finally had the last straw when her husband took away her keys and phone and changed the locks without her knowing.

In February of 2015 Y attempted to file a Family Offense Petition against her husband but it was dismissed at the first appearance because why was unable to miss work to attend. In April of 2015, Y started to get concerned that she did receive any correspondence from USCIS and asked her lawyer if there were any updates. Y eventually learned that her I-751 was denied in July of 2015 after she did not respond to a Request For Evidence. Y’s husband hid the correspondence from USCIS. Y was confused why her attorney failed to inform her of the denial. Shortly thereafter, Y contacted The Shapiro Law Firm after her cousin met Attorney Shaffer and discussed Y’s case. Attorney Shaffer said that something did not sound right because Y’s attorney should have also received all of the correspondence from USCIS and should have appeared in Family Court for Y to request an adjournment so the case was not dismissed. Attorney Shaffer quickly learned that Y’s attorney was disbarred in 1999! Y immediately hired us and switched attorneys upon learning this information. We then re-filed Y’s Family Offense Petition and the I-751 as a self-petition based on the abuse suffered by Y at the hands of her U.S. Citizen husband. The family court granted the family offense petition for Y, and although we re-filed the I-751 as quickly as possible, Y and her son were placed into Removal/ Deportation Proceedings as a result of the initial I-751 denial. Now that the I-751 was approved, we have filed a motion to terminate removal proceedings with the immigration court which should be promptly granted.

I-797, Notice of Removal of Conditional Basis of Lawful Permanent Residence

I-797, Notice of Removal of Conditional Basis of Lawful Permanent Residence


Marriage Petition (I-130) Approval for Spouse of U.S. Citizen after Stokes Interview –Another I-130 immigrant visa approval for a client, (hereinafter, “U”), a native and citizen of Mali. U and his wife did not use an attorney to file the applications and came to us for help after they attended their first marriage interview and were told they would receive a request for evidence in the mail, but did not receive any further correspondence from USCIS for over a year!

We personally delivered a letter to the interviewing officer and a few weeks later U and his wife were scheduled for a Stokes Interview. We accompanied the couple to the Stokes Interview and a few days later we received the approval notice in the mail! U should receive his Green Card as soon as his background and security checks are complete. U and his wife have been married for over 2-years so U will receive a 10-year Green Card.

Notice of Approval of Relative Immigrant Visa Petition


Marriage Petition (I-130) Approval – We also received an I-130 marriage petition approval notice for the spouse of a U.S. Citizen (hereinafter, “S”). S is a native and citizen of Mexico. S entered the country without inspection (EWI) so he now needs to file a I-601A waiver for his unlawful entry. An I-601A waiver, known as the Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver is based on the extreme hardship that certain U.S. Citizen and Lawful Permanent Spouses and/ or Parents of the Applicant would suffer if he or she is unable to obtain legal status. Once the waiver is approved, the applicant must depart the U.S. for his or her visa interview at the U.S. Embassy/ Consulate abroad.

The nice thing about this waiver, as opposed to other waivers of inadmissibilities is the Applicant will not have to depart the country until the visa interview is scheduled, and thus will only be out of the country a few weeks. Other waivers require the applicant to first depart the country then file the waiver and wait outside the U.S. while it is adjudicated, which can take 6 months to a year or more!

S’s waiver will be based on the extreme hardship to his U.S. Citizen wife and they are very eager to start the next step in the process of obtaining S’s Green Card.

I-797C, I-130 Petition for Alien Relative Approval


DACA Renewal Approved – We also received an approval notice for a Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Renewal for a client, (hereinafter “Z”), who is a native and citizen of Indonesia. Remember, you only have until THIS THURSDAY OCTOBER 5 to send your DACA renewal applications to USCIS before they stop accepting the applications. It MUST BE RECEIVED by OCTOBER 5! Call us immediately if you need help filing!

Fortunately for Z, although this will be the last time she can renew her DACA, she already has an approved I-130 petition filed by her LPR Step-father and just finished the Consular Visa Processing. As soon as Z’s visa interview is scheduled in Jarkata, she will leave the U.S. for the interview, and if all goes according to plan, she will re-enter the U.S. as a Lawful Permanent Resident!

I-797C, I-821D Approval Notice


Green Card (I-485) Approval for VAWA and (previous) Withholding of Removal Beneficiary – We also received an approval for a Green Card for a VAWA and Withholding of Removal Beneficiary who is native and citizen of Mali (hereinafter client “W”). W entered the U.S. in 1998 with a B-2 Visitor Visa to join her husband, who previously fled Mali and was eventually granted asylum.

W applied for asylum long after the 1-year filing deadline so she was placed into removal proceedings, eventually the court granted her Withholding of Removal in 2012. Around the same time, W’s husband adjusted status to a permanent resident based on his asylee status and then filed a marriage petition on W’s behalf. Unfortunately, shortly thereafter, W’s husband started to abuse her and he was arrested on domestic violence charges and W obtained an order of protection against him. W left her husband so we filed a VAWA petition for her. Once the VAWA petition was approved, we filed a joint motion with DHS to terminate W’s Removal Proceedings so she can apply for a Green Card! W is thrilled to finally be a Lawful Permanent Resident!

I-797, I-485 - Application to Adjust Status to Permanent Resident  Approval Notice


We wish all of our recently-approved clients the best of luck!


**If you need representation in Removal/ Deportation proceedings or with help filing for immigration benefits, contact an experienced immigration attorney at The Shapiro Law Firm today to get started!**


(*please note that all identification information has been removed in order to protect our clients’ privacy and in order to fully comply with attorney advertising rules and regulations*)

USCIS News Release: Deadline to Submit DACA Renewal Requests Approaching On Oct. 5

USCIS News Release

Deadline to Submit DACA Renewal Requests Approaching On Oct. 5

Release Date: September 28, 2017

In accordance with President Trump’s announcement to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, DACA Beneficiaries have until October 5, 2017 to submit renewal applications. You are eligible for renewal only if you work authorization expires between September 5, 2017 and March 8, 2018. For the full news release click here.

If you need to submit a DACA renewal or are unsure about what will happen to your immigration status once the DACA program is terminated, contact us IMMEDIATELY!!!


Questions about filing for DACA? Click here to contact an experienced immigration attorney at The Shapiro Law Firm, LLC today.


Note: “Attorney Advertising” The information contained in this web site is intended to convey general information. It should not be construed as legal advice or opinion. It is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Any email sent via the Internet using email addresses listed in this web site would not be confidential and would not create an attorney-client relationship.

USCIS News Release: USCIS to Expand In-Person Interview Requirements for Certain Permanent Residency Applicants

USCIS News Release

USCIS to Expand In-Person Interview Requirements for Certain Permanent Residency Applicants

Release Date: August 28, 2017

In compliance with Executive Order 13780, “Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States,” USCIS has expanding the in-person interview requirement to include the following applicants applying for permanent residency:

1. Employment-based Adjustment of Status Applicants, and;

2. Refugee/ Asylee Relative Petitions for Beneficiaries who are already in U.S.

For the full press release, click here.

Expect longer wait times for Green Card interviews for all applications types.


Questions about filing for Adjustment of Status? Click here to contact an experienced immigration attorney at The Shapiro Law Firm, LLC today.


Note: “Attorney Advertising” The information contained in this web site is intended to convey general information. It should not be construed as legal advice or opinion. It is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Any email sent via the Internet using email addresses listed in this web site would not be confidential and would not create an attorney-client relationship.

Case Status Update: Approvals: Naturalization & Work Permits

Naturalization Application ApprovedTwo weeks ago attorney Shaffer attended a naturalization interview with a client, (hereinafter, client “X”), a native and citizen of Haiti. X aced his interview and will officially be a U.S. Citizen when he takes his oath of allegiance at his upcoming Naturalization Ceremony. X is excited to finally become a U.S. Citizen! Congratulations!

Naturalization (N-400) Interview Approval


Work Permit Renewal Approved for VAWA Recipient – Last week we received an approval notice for an Employment Authorization Document (EAD), (hereinafter, Client “Y”), who is a native and citizen of Nigeria. This is a renewal work permit for Y and is based on his pending Violence Against Women’s Act (VAWA) and concurrent Green Card applications. Y came to the U.S. in 2015 with a B1/B2 Visitor Visa and married a U.S. Citizen shortly thereafter. Y’s good faith marriage came to an abrupt end when his wife and a few friends maced him and stole his wallet when he refused to give her more money. Y had to be treated at the hospital and thankfully is doing much better.

Although this horrific incident forced him to separate from his wife, he is clearly a victim of domestic abuse and thus was able to keep open his Green Card application by filing a VAWA petition.

Form I-797, I-765 Approval Notice


Work Permit (EAD) Approvals for Asylum Applicants – We received work permit approval notices for five more clients who are asylum applicants:

Our first client, (hereinafter “Z”), is a native and citizen of Nigeria. Z, her husband and son entered the U.S. about a year ago with a B2 Visitor Visa and quickly filed for asylum. Z and her family are currently waiting for their asylum interview.

Form I-797C, I-765 Approval Notice

The second client, (hereinafter “W”), is also a native and citizen of Nigeria. W and her family also came to the U.S. in 2016 and filed for asylum within a year of their entry.. W and her family initially had their work permits approved back in February, but their EAD cards were stolen from their mailbox. As a result, W and her family were forced to file for a replacement EAD. W and her family are also waiting for their asylum interview.

Form I-797C, I-765 Approval Notice

Form I-797C, I-765 Approval Notice

The work permits allow W and Z (and their family members who applied) to work legally in the United States while they both await their Asylum interviews. Current wait times for Asylum interview if you live in the New York, NY area is about 2.5 – 3 years.

Our third client, (hereinafter, “V”), is a native and citizen of Ghana. V first came to the U.S. as a child in 1994 and continuously resided here until 2011 when V decided to return to Ghana to see his 95-year-old Grandmother before she passed away.

Back in Ghana, V became active in an opposition political party. It was not long before the government came after V and his friends who were attempting to bring to light government abuse and corruption. Fearing severe bodily harm and death, V fled Ghana and attempted to re-enter the U.S. with someone else’s passport. At the airport, V immediately admitted that he did not have permission to enter the U.S. and was detained by immigration and given a credible fear interview. Upon finding that V had a credible fear of returning to Ghana, V was released from detention. He subsequently filed for asylum and withholding of removal and placed into removal/ deportation proceedings.

Despite having a strong Withholding of Removal claim and an approved marriage petition filed by his U.S. Citizen wife, V faced many inadmissibility hurdles, including possible fraud and misrepresentation, so in November of 2015 V’s removal proceedings were administratively closed.

Although V does not have a future court date, he is still considered “in removal proceedings,” which means that his asylum application is still pending, allowing him to apply for EAD renewals.


Our last work permit approval for an asylum applicant is a client, (hereinafter, “T”), a native of Niger and citizen of Mali. T entered the U.S. without inspection in 1997. T, a victim of the horrific practice of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), did not apply for Asylum until 2013, so she was referred to the Immigration Court after her Asylum interview earlier this year. Since T did not file within the 1-year filing deadline, she will not be eligible for asylum, but will be eligible for Withholding of Removal. T is also a mother of 5 U.S. Citizen children and is looking to file an application for Cancellation of Removal for non-Lawful Permanent Residents. While T waits for her first hearing before the immigration judge, she will be able to legally work.


Work Permit (EAD) Approval for Applicant for Cancellation of Removal for Non-Lawful Permanent Resident– Last week we also received a work permit approval for our client, (hereinafter “U”), who is a native and citizen of Trinidad & Tobago. U entered the U.S. in 2000 with a B2 Visitor Visa. U and her husband applied for asylum after the 1-year deadline passed and were thus placed into removal/ deportation proceedings. U then submitted an application for cancellation of removal for non-lawful permanent residents based on the extreme hardship to her U.S. Citizen children. Last year, the Immigration Judge administratively closed U and her husband’s case. As with asylum applications, U’s cancellation application remains pending, allowing her to renew her work permit as needed.

I-797C, I-765 Approval Notice


We wish all of our recently-approved clients the best of luck!


**If you need representation in Removal/ Deportation proceedings or with help filing for immigration benefits, contact an experienced immigration attorney at The Shapiro Law Firm today to get started!**


(*please note that all identification information has been removed in order to protect our clients’ privacy and in order to fully comply with attorney advertising rules and regulations*)

Case Status Update: Approvals: Work Permits, Travel Documents & Naturalization

Naturalization Application ApprovedTwo weeks ago attorney Shaffer attended a naturalization interview with a client, (hereinafter, client “X”), a native and citizen of Brazil. X aced his interview and will officially be a U.S. Citizen when he takes his oath of allegiance at his upcoming Naturalization Ceremony. X is married to a U.S. Citizen and has been a Green Card Holder now for over 10 years. X is excited to finally become a U.S. Citizen! Congratulations!

Naturalization (N-400) Interview Approval


Work Permit & Travel Document Approved for VAWA Recipient – Last week we received approval notices for an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) and Advance Parole Travel Document for a client, (hereinafter, Client “Y”), who is a native and citizen of Jamaica. Y’s work permit and travel document is based on her pending Violence Against Women’s Act (VAWA) and concurrent green card applications. Y came to the U.S. in 2002 with a B1/B2 Visitor Visa and in 2014 she married a U.S. Citizen. Y thought she had met the love of her life, but unfortunately, shortly after getting married, Y’s spouse started to abuse her.

The verbal abuse turned into physical abuse when he punched her in the face. Y was too afraid to go to the police at the time as she was not in the U.S. legally. Last year, Y was finally able to escape her abusive husband and came to us to help her file a VAWA application so that she can finally become a Permanent Resident and straighten her life out. Y explained to us that she in no way married her husband to obtain a Green Card, and in fact he never even filed for her. Fortunately, VAWA does not require the abusive U.S. Citizen or Lawful Permanent Resident spouse to have previously filed for the immigrant spouse to be eligible for VAWA.

Y is currently waiting for her Green Card interview and is extremely happy that she can work legally while she waits and can also go back to Jamaica to see her daughter who she has not seen in over 15 years.

Form I-797, I-765 & I-131 Approval Notice


Work Permit (EAD) Approvals for Asylum Applicants – We received work permit approval notices for three of our clients who are asylum applicants:

Our first client, (hereinafter “Z”), is a native and citizen of Indonesia. Z entered the U.S. in 2005 with a B2 Visitor Visa and has not left the U.S. since. Z is currently waiting for her asylum interview.

Form I-797C, I-765 Approval Notice

The second client, (hereinafter “W”), is a native and citizen of Cote d’ Ivoire (Ivory Coast). W came to the U.S. in 2013 and filed for asylum within a year of his entry. W is also waiting for his asylum interview.

Form I-797C, I-765 Approval Notice

The work permits allow W and Z to work legally in the United States while they both await their Asylum interviews. Current wait times for Asylum interview if you live in the New York, NY area is about 2.5 years.

Our third client, (hereinafter, “V”), is a native and citizen of Mali. V came to the U.S. in 2000 with a B2 Visitor Visa. V applied for asylum and was placed into removal/ deportation proceedings after the asylum officer did not grant his application. In November of 2016, V’s removal proceedings were administratively closed. Although V does not have a future court date, he is still considered “in removal proceedings,” which means that his asylum application is still pending, allowing him to apply for EAD renewals. If V becomes eligible for another form of relief from removal, he can file a motion to recalendar his case. For now, V is happy to be able to remain in the U.S. and legally work.


Work Permit (EAD) Approval for Applicant for Cancellation of Removal for Non-Lawful Permanent Resident– Last week we also received a work permit approval for our client, (hereinafter “U”), who is a native and citizen of Senegal. U entered the U.S. in 2005 and was paroled into the country. U and her husband applied for asylum after the 1-year deadline passed and were thus placed into removal/ deportation proceedings. U then submitted an application for cancellation of removal for non-lawful permanent residents based on the extreme hardship to her U.S. Citizen children. Last year, the Immigration Judge administratively closed U and her husband’s case. As with asylum applications, U’s cancellation application remains pending, allowing her to renew her work permit as needed.

I-797C, I-765 Approval Notice


Work Permit (EAD) Approval for Adjustment Applicant (Parent of U.S. Citizen) – We also received an approval notice for both a work permit for our client, (hereinafter “T”), a native and citizen of Jamaica. T had been a Green Card Holder for over 20 years when he received a notice from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) informing him that his previous attorney was now in jail and that he is no in deportation/ removal proceedings because his Green Card was obtained through fraud of his previous attorney and was thus invalid. T was shell-shocked by the allegations as he had no idea that rather than file an labor visa petition for T over 20 years ago, his attorney just paid of someone who worked form INS. T was not involved at all in the fraud and DHS has not implicated in the crime at all.

Unfortunately, T’s lack of knowledge or involvement does not eliminate the fact that his Green Card is invalid and that he has actually been here illegally all of this time. Fortunately, however, T has several U.S. Citizen children who were more than happy to file for their father. T can now work legally while he waits for his individual (merits) hearing before the Immigration Judge to adjudicate his Green Card application in 2019.

Form I-797C, I-765 Approval Notice


Work Permit (EAD) Approval for Withholding of Removal Beneficiary – Finally, we received a work permit approval for our client, (hereinafter, Client “S”), who is a native and citizen of Mali. S entered the U.S. in 2000 with a B2 Visitor Visa. After over a decade in Immigration Court, she was granted Withholding of Removal by the Immigration Judge. Withholding of Removal is very similar to Asylum, in fact the same form is used to apply for both, but those granted withholding can never obtain a Green Card. Rather, withholding allows an individual to remain in the U.S. indefinitely and legally work, provided he or she timely renews it every year. Withholding of removal applicants do not have to apply within a year of entering the country.

Form I-797C, I-765 Approval Notice


We wish all of our recently-approved clients the best of luck!


**If you need representation in Removal/ Deportation proceedings or with help filing for immigration benefits, contact an experienced immigration attorney at The Shapiro Law Firm today to get started!**


(*please note that all identification information has been removed in order to protect our clients’ privacy and in order to fully comply with attorney advertising rules and regulations*)

What You Really Want to Know | Episode #14 | Am I Eligible For an Extraordinary Ability Visa?

Transcript: Hi, I’m Attorney Shaffer, Today on “What You Really Want to Know,” we answer the question, “Am I eligible for an extraordinary ability visa?”

The answer is, it depends! Eligibility for an Extraordinary Ability, (hereinafter, “EA”), visa is fact specific and must be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. These visas are reserved for the best of the best. This means that you must be at the tippy-top of your field, and the fields that you can be in are: the sciences, the arts, athletics, education or business.

These visas are highly coveted since there is generally no wait time to get a Green Card and you can file for yourself rather than having to find an employer to file for you, which is generally required for most employment-based visas.

Before we look at the extraordinary ability factors, it is important to note that there are 2 types of EA visas- the O-1 nonimmigrant or a temporary visa and EB-1 immigrant or permanent visa. If you are looking to get a Green Card, you are only going to be able to get one if you have an EB-1 immigrant visa.

There are other important differences between the two visas that are outside the scope of this episode, but may be important in guiding our decision when advising a client whether to file for one or the other.

But when a client comes to us and says “I would like to file for an extraordinary ability visa,” we do not tell them to file for an O-1 instead of an EB-1, or vice versa, because that person is less extraordinary or has less evidence of his or her EA. That is because, generally speaking, the type and level of proof of the EA needed for both types of visas is the same.

So when a client comes to us, we may look at these other factors but the first thing we have to do is determine if this person even qualifies for an EA visa.

And I do not want to lump the two together because there are important differences between the type of evidence that must be shown and I highly recommend that you contact an experienced immigration attorney for more information because in today’s episode we are really just going to focus on EB-1 immigrant visas.

So if you are applying for an EB-1 immigrant visas, you must have extensive documentation showing sustained national or international acclaim and recognition in your field of expertise.

So to prove to USCIS that you are truly the best you must have either won a major international award like the Nobel peace prize or be able to show 3 of the following 10 factors:

  1. Receipt of nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in your field of endeavor;

  2. Membership in associations in the field for which classification is sought which require outstanding achievements, as judged by recognized national or international experts in the field;

  3. Published material in professional or major trade publications, newspapers or other major media about the you or your work in the field for which classification is sought;

  4. Participation either on a panel, or individually, as a judge of the work of others in the same or a similar field of specialization in which classification is sought;

  5. Original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance to the field;

  6. Authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media in the field in which classification is sought;

  7. A high salary or other remuneration for services as evidenced by contracts or other reliable evidence;

  8. Evidence that you have performed in a leading or critical role for organizations or establishments that have distinguished reputations;

  9. Display of your work at artistic exhibitions or showcases, and;

  10. Evidence of commercial successes in the performing arts, as shown by box office receipts or music or video sales.

And remember, you need to show 3 out of the 10 [factors] that I just listed.

We love filing extraordinary ability visas here at The Shapiro Law Firm because we get to meet fascinating people who are exceptional, accomplished and impressive. And we are extremely successful at filing these visas, in fact we have never filed an EA visa that has been denied!

If you think that you are eligible for an EA visa or you would like to learn what other visas that you may be eligible for, contact us today!

That is all for this episode of “What You Really Want to Know,” thanks for watching!


**Attorney Advertising** Please be advised that that all information provided above is general in nature and does not create an attorney-client relationship.**Attorney Advertising**