Case Status Updates: Green Card for Asylee, Work Permit Renewal Approval & Work Permit Replacement Approval

Case Status Update | The Shapiro Law Firm, LLC

Asylee Green Card Approval: The Shapiro Law Firm would like to congratulate 1 of our clients, (hereinafter, “Client X”), who was approved to adjust her status from an Asylee to a Permanent Resident! X is a native and citizen of The Gambia. X came to the U.S. on a B1/B2 Visitor Visa and overstayed a previous entry because she was afraid to return home. At age 18, her father was forcing her to marry her Uncle who was twice her age. When her father died, she felt it was safe for her to return home so she left the U.S. She subsequently married the man that she loved, but she began to have problems when she was unable to bear a child for him. Her husband’s family physically assaulted her and ostrasized her for not being able to conceive. In 2011, she was fortunate in being able to secure another visitor visa to come back to the U.S., but when she got to the border, she was questioned about her previous overstay, was detained by ICE and given a credible fear interview when she expressed her fear of persecution if she was forced to go home.

She was released from custody after a few weeks and given an given a date to appear in immigration court . At the end of 2014, the Immigration Judge granted her application for Asylum. She then had to wait 1 year to apply for her Green Card, and she finally received her approval this week!

She now lives in Atlanta, GA, with her infant daughter (she was finally able to conceive thanks to fertility doctors). Since her Green Card was based on her status as an Asylee, X only has to wait 4 years to apply for her citizenship (instead of the normal 5 years).


Work Permit Replacement Approval: A work permit replacement was approved for our client who is a native and citizen of Nigeria, (hereinafter, “Client W”). W is married to a U.S. Citizen who filed a marriage petition on his behalf. W received his work permit based on his pending adjustment of status application. His employment authorization application was approved back in May, but despite the fact that the post office said that they delivered his EAD card to the correct address, W never received it so he had to pay to file for a replacement card (adjustment applicants are generally not required to pay a filing fee for an initial or renewal EAD card, but must for a replacement).

W had to also file a police report to submit with his replacement application. Unfortunately, we often have clients who do not receive their work permits or green cards because their mail is stolen right out of their mailbox. These are very valuable documents and there is a high rate of theft involved.

If this has happened to you, we can help! Many of our clients have these invaluable documents sent to our office and they then arrange to come pick it up in person. Contact us today if this happened to you!


Work Permit Renewal Approval: Another Work Permit Renewal granted to our client who is a native and citizen of Trinidad & Tobago, awaiting a decision on a cancellation of removal application for non-permanent residents (aka 10-year cancellation).


(*please note that all identification information has been removed in order to protect our clients’ privacy and in order to fully comply with attorney advertising rules and regulations*)

News Release: USCIS Increases Validity of Work Permits to Two Years for Asylum Applicants

Front of Employment Authorization Document aka Work Permit

Good news for Asylum Applicants – all work permits issued to asylum applicants by USCIS will not be valid for 2 years instead of 1 year! This news should come as a relief to the overwhelming number of asylum applicants who, on average, can wait up to 2 or more years for their initial interview. Although the initial work permit does not have a filing fee for asylum applicants, every subsequent year that the work permit is renewed, will cost an asylum applicant $380 in filing fees. Compare this to adjustment of status applicants who are not required to pay filing fees for work permit renewals (and are currently still required to renew their work permit every year).


Here is the USCIS Press Release on the matter:

USCIS Increases Validity of Work Permits to Two Years for Asylum Applicants

Effective October 5, 2016, USCIS has increased the validity period for initial or renewal Employment Authorization Documents for asylum applicants from one year to two years. Applicants with pending asylum claims file Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, under category (c)(8). This change applies to all (c)(8)-based applications that are pending as of October 5, 2016 and all such applications filed on or after October 5, 2016.


Need help applying for a work permit or want to find out if you are eligible to apply for one? Contact us today for help!

An Immigration Attorney Fact Checks the Second Presidential Debate

The Second Presidential Debate once again lacked specific policy provisions for each candidate’s immigration plan.

The obvious exception was the discussion about Trump’s previous promise to temporarily ban all muslims that he refers to as “extreme vetting.” Sunday night, Trump expanded on this notion stating that his plan would temporarily suspendimmigration from regions that export terrorism and possibly that he would allow some immigration of muslims provided that they face additional screening.

It should first be noted that immigrants looking to come to the United States legally from countries that are known to harbor terrorists face a litany of additional screening processes already. For example, a Syrian Refugee will face 18 -24 months of intense screening before he or she is admitted to the United States. During the screening process, Syrian Refugees stay in UNHCR Refugee Camps, anxiously awaiting placement in a safe country. Our country already has a lot of safeguards in place to prevent terrorists from entering the U.S. Here is an infographic published by the U.S. Federal Government explaining the Refugee Screening Process:

The Screening Process for Refugee Entry into the U.S.

Is our current vetting process effective? There are varying answers to this question. Some say that we have had very few terrorist-related arrests and no terrorist attacks on U.S. soil by Syrian Refugees in recent memory. Others point to the involvement of Syrian Refugees in the recent Paris bombings along with proof that ISIS has, and continues to, attempt to infiltrate the Refugee system in order to get into the U.S. and other Western Nations to commit future terrorist attacks.

One thing is clear, although America continues to witness horrific acts of terror on its’ own soil, 55 of the 68 people indicted over alleged ISIS ties were born in U.S. and none came from Syria (of the remaining 13: 6 were born in Bosnia, 4 in Uzbekistan, 3 in Somalia and 2 were born in Sudan). Read more about this here.

What is important here is to realize that the fact that so many domestic-born Americans have engaged in such horrific acts against their fellow American citizens is evidence of a much larger issue here at home. An issue, that I truly believe, needs to take a good look at the mental health of terrorist actors here and abroad.

I agree with Mr. Trump that we need to ensure that our borders are safe and that our people are not at risk, but in order to do that we need to really understand why people want to attack us in the first place and how we can stop it at the source. It is easy to scapegoat a particular religion or group of people, but pointing fingers does not solve the problem at hand.

Shapiro Law Firm Alert!: Why Permanent Residents Should Naturalize As Soon As Possible!

Why Permanent Residents Should Naturalize ASAP

Are you a Permanent Resident who is eligible for U.S. citizenship but has yet to apply for naturalization? Permanent Residents are not required by U.S. law to naturalize. Rather, Permanent Residents can opt to indefinitely renew their Green Cards every 10 years. In my experience, one of the main reasons a person chooses not to naturalize, is because he or she does not fully understand the difference between the two immigration statuses.

So, if you have any doubt about why you should become a U.S. Citizen as soon as possible, I implore you to read on.

U.S. Citizenship holds many well-known perks, such as the right to vote. But there are also a lot of benefits of being a U.S. Citizen that are not as obvious. Most notably, proof of U.S. Citizenship requires automatic termination of Removal Proceedings. This means that once a foreign-born individual becomes a U.S. Citizen, that precious right can only be taken away by the U.S. government in federal court, which is a much more burdensome process with a high burden of proof placed on the government. In fact, the U.S. Department of Justice, often chooses not to initiate these proceedings, even with evidence of fraud.

Unlike U.S. Citizens, Permanent Residents face a far greater risk in having their immigration status revoked (and thus subject to deportation/ removal) for minor violations. For example, even minor criminal offenses can put a Permanent Resident’s status in jeopardy, forcing him or her to defend his or her right to stay in the U.S. in Immigration Court. Removal Proceedings may be initiated one has been convicted of a criminal offense, but one does not have to be a criminal or accused of committing a crime to be placed in Removal Proceedings. As such, a Green Card holder can go years before learning that an incident occurred invalidating his or her Permanent Resident Status. Often, it is not until one is charged as removal and issued a Notice to Appear, (NTA), that he or she first discovers that there is anything wrong.

To help illustrate this, here is an example for one of our immigration clients (*please note that all identification information has been removed in order to protect our client’s privacy and in order to fully comply with attorney advertising rules and regulations*):

Our client, (hereinafter, “X”), has been a Permanent Resident for almost 20 years. X has no criminal history has has never violated any immigration laws. When he applied to renew his Green Card, instead of getting a new card, he was served with a Notice to Appear in Immigration Court. Unbeknownst to X, the lawyer that he hired to help him file for a Green Card almost 2 decades ago, had been paying an INS agent to illegally change hundreds of his clients’ INS records to say that each person had an approved employment-based visa petition, and thus were eligible for a Green Card. Back then, Green Cards were issued with 20-Year validity periods, so for 20 years X did not have to file any applications or petitions with INS (presently, USCIS). X also had no idea that about 10 years ago, his former lawyer and the INS agent were convicted for their roles in a scheme that allowed hundreds of individuals to fraudulently obtain immigration benefits.

So when X filed for renewal, USCIS saw the red flag placed on his file, denied his renewal application and placed him into Removal Proceedings. To make matters worse, X filed for his son, who was also still a Permanent Resident. This means that X’s son’s green card could also be revoked because his eligibility was dependent on his father’s eligibility.

X’s first hearing before the Immigration Judge is next year. We are confident that we will sufficiently prove to the court that X is an innocent victim in all of this. But even if the judge agrees, X will not get back his Green Card since he does not have an approved immigrant visa petition. Rather, we will have to find if there is an independent basis to file an immigrant visa petition for X (e.g., marriage to a U.S. Citizen) or some form of relief from removal for him to apply for.

Had X naturalized prior to the aforementioned lawyer and INS agent convictions, the U.S. government would then be required to initiate denaturalization proceedings against him in federal court, which is a much more burdensome process and one that the U.S. government tends to rarely invoke.

What can we learn from X’s story? Life is unpredictable and you need to protect yourself from any unforeseeable events that may arise. The choice to remain a Permanent Resident rather than naturalizing is a right, but it also is a choice that carries with it great risk. Make sure that you fully understand the consequences involved before it is too late.

Interested in becoming a U.S. Citizen? Contact an experienced immigration attorney at The Shapiro Law Firm, LLC, in New York City to learn more.

Shapiro Law Firm Case Status Alert: Removal Proceedings Terminated!

Removal/ Deportation Defense Lawyers in NYC

This just in: Attorney Shapiro successfully terminates Removal Proceedings this morning in Immigration Court for another Client. (hereinafter, Client M). Client M is a native and citizen of Cote d’Ivoire (Ivory Coast) how has been in the U.S. since 1996. Client M has 4 children, of whom 1 is a native-born U.S. Citizen and another is a naturalized U.S. Citizen. After years of court, his daughter was able to file a family-based petition on Client M’s behalf. Attorney Shapiro was able to secure terminate of Removal Proceedings with the approval of the immigrant visa petition.


What is next for Client M? He can no apply for his Green Card!

An Immigration Attorney Fact-Checks Last Night's Presidential Debate

Although the issue of U.S. immigration was not a main topic in last night’s presidential debate, Mr. Trump managed to get in some of his talking points. Secretary Clinton was largely quiet on this topic, not responding to Mr. Trump’s remarks. Below are the two main points that Mr. Trump made and how his statements stand up to the facts:

1. Immigrants do not commit more crimes

When asked about race relations in America, Trump responded, “We have gangs roaming the street. And in many cases, they’re illegally here, illegal immigrants. And they have guns. And they shoot people. And we have to be very strong. And we have to be very vigilant.”

My Verdict = FALSE: As the CATO Institute Report shows, Mr. Trump is promoting a false narrative by alleging that illegal immigrants, or immigrants for that matter, are more likely to commit crimes than native-born Americans.

For more see the TIME magazine article posted last night in response to Mr. Trump’s comments here.


2. Over 858 individuals with final deportation or removal orders were Naturalized

Mr. Trump stated, “The other day we were deporting eight hundred people and perhaps they pressed the wrong button –they pressed the wrong button– or perhaps worse than that it was corruption. But these people we were going to deport … for good reason ended up becoming citizens–ended up becoming citizens. And it was eight hundred and now it turns out, it might be fifteen hundred and they don’t even know.”

My Verdict = MOSTLY FALSE: The 858 people mentioned in the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) Report, “Potentially Ineligible Individuals Have Been Granted U.S. Citizenship Because of Incomplete Fingerprint Records,” that Mr. Trump is referring to, had final orders of deportation or removal at the time their naturalization application was reviewed and adjudicated. Mr. Trump is correct about that and he is correct that the number is actually higher (1,811 total), if you include the number of individuals who had final orders of deportation or removal who are now naturalized citizens who may not have had digital fingerprints on file at the time they naturalized.

Mr. Trump, however, is incorrect to allege that corruption is to blame or that we do not know what happened. Before 2008, there was no federal digital fingerprint process and it was much harder to affirm that an applicant did not have another identity. The digital fingerprint system has been in place in full for a few years and now and has greatly improved USCIS’s ability to verify who a person is. I can tell you first hand that USCIS has its problems and the immigration system is very confusing and a tedious process to navigate, but this is clearly a result of antiquated technology taking time to be replaced. No immigration system will ever be perfect, perfection is idealistic.

Mr. Trump also implies that all 858 of these individuals should not be citizens. The fact is that just because you have a previous order of deportation or removal does not, in and of itself, mean that you are ineligible for citizenship. It also does not mean that any of these people committed fraud or misrepresentation in obtaining their citizenship. All it means it that their immigration history shows a deportation or removal order. Removal and Deportation Orders can be terminated or vacated at a later date for any number of reasons (Hence the title of the OIG Report that begins, “Potentially Ineligible Individuals…”).

When will my Asylum Interview be Scheduled?

If you have filed for Affirmative Asylum in the past 3-4 years, you may be wondering when you are going to have your asylum interview. Wait periods are at an all time high right now, and we know first hand how frustrating it can be for applicants who have been waiting endlessly with no answers from USCIS. Recently, USCIS posted approximate interview wait times. Click the link below to read more.

Asylum Interview Wait Times

Affirmative Asylum Scheduling Bulletin | USCIS